Strange Dreams, Koontz and (briefly) King – Part 1

Lately, I haven’t been sleeping well. It seems every time I get into REM sleep, I wake up halfway through the dream. Last night, people (I don’t know who they were) were hanging around me (in some unknown location) and pestering me to write more, faster and better. With some small success behind me and many years of studying the craft of writing and the markets, I can interpret my dream in one of two ways: wishful fantasy or nightmare.

I’d love to have multitudes of book-buying fans eager for more stories. What writer wouldn’t? On the flip side, may of those fans clamor for their favorite author’s next book right after reading the one that just got published.  Not many of them, unless they’re writers, too, understand how much time, work, and often, sleep deprivation goes into a novel or that the same amount of effort goes into a book whether it turns out to be a page-turner or a dud. We’re talking long, lonely hours of writing, research, rewriting, editing with sometimes not the hoped for results either in advancing one’s craft, readership or income.

Yep, it takes much less time to read a book than to write one. For those of you who don’t believe that, I say: Go ahead. Try it. Participate in NaNoWriMo­—National Write a Novel in a Month—this November. See if you can rack up 50,000 words, coherent or otherwise, in 30 days. Then add another 20,000 to 25,000 words to get it to 70,000 to 75,000—the word count most publishers consider the minimum for novel-length fiction. It’s definitely a good experience for anyone who has the notion “one day I’ll write a novel” but hasn’t typed a word (except texts, tweets and emails) since college.

Tirade over.  Tirade cause? Probably the fact that, basically, I’m tired…all the time and have been for many years. After working my day job, I come home and try to write at night. As one of my friends pointed out, I’ve been trying to hold down two full times jobs.  And the night shift, aside from not paying well (or anything most of the time) ain’t that productive.  It’s difficult to be creative when sleep-deprived. After having written two novels (unpublished) and three novellas (published under a pen name), I can tell you that my dream of last night tipped more toward the nightmare side.  My last novella was published in the summer of 2009. From a reader’s perspective, it looks like I’ve let the ball drop. Not true. I’ve been working steadily, albeit very slowly on two new books, but completed neither this year. (Guess what’s at the topped of list for my 2011 resolutions.)

Aside form exhaustion, there’s another factor that sometimes throws a spanner in the works. Writer’s block it’s not. (In fact, I don’t believe in writer’s block, but that’s a topic for another time.) What does sometimes slow me down is the unsettling realization that success, while highly desired, brings its own set of woes, even for those wunderkind who seem to hit the bestseller lists every time they go up to bat. I know, I know. I have a long way to get to that point if  I ever do, but—since over analyzing is my thing—it’s still cause for concern. Besides, looking to my writer heroes for inspiration, I can’t help but acknowledge their setbacks as well as their successes.

Take Dean Koontz, for example. His latest, released this past December, didn’t get very good reviews out of the gate. Publishers Weekly said it’s “less than suspenseful.” Not good for a suspense novel. Koontz is one of my favorite authors—which is not to say I love everything he’s written. So have I run out to buy Koontz’s latest book? No. Like many others, I’ll probably wait to get it from my library or buy a used copy on Amazon.com. Why? Truth to tell, I’ve been disappointed in the endings of many of Koontz’s recent novels, so I tend to shell out the big bucks for a shiny new hardcover version only if it’s from one of the series that I love. Had it been a new book in the Odd Thomas series, I’d have pre-ordered a copy as soon as I was able.

Here’s the crux with Koontz: he doesn’t hit one out of the park every time. This doesn’t upset me as a fan. Eventually, I do read everything he writes. No matter where Koontz’s efforts fall on the sales lists or my own list f favorites, I still admire and respect him as a writer. Every author has work that misses the mark, especially when he’s written as many books as Koontz has. How many? Over 70 novels. (I confess, when I got to 70 on the Wikipedia list, I stopped counting.)

I’ll continue to look forward to the books where he expands and explores the craft of writing. That kind of book hasn’t been coming out of his fingertips lately though. What’s happening? As with other popular authors, I see him churning out two or three books a year. No doubt, he loves to write, but he’s also one of those brand names now with readers and publishers clamoring for fresh product on the shelves. I have to wonder at our demands on top authors today. Take into account the much smaller bodies of work of successful fiction writers in the past. And I’d have to say we’re too greedy, authors and public alike. Conan Doyle, for instance, wrote 56 Sherlock Holmes stories—but note, that’s stories, not novels, no where near the word count of today’s best-sellers. Is our hunger for more books, creating a market of less satisfying books? I’d have to say yes.

(Oops. Running too long. King will have to wait for Part 2.)

Posted in Dean Koontz, Stephen King, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Strange Dreams, Koontz and (briefly) King – Part 1

Tonight Serenity flies again

Tonight’s the night to tune into the Science Channel and watch Firefly from the beginning. What else is there to say but…Shiny!

Posted in Firefly, sci fi shows | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Tonight Serenity flies again

Firefly much?

Firefly – short-lived television series created by Joss Whedon, which premiered on September 20th, 2002 and was canceled by December of the same year; only 11 of the 14 filmed episodes were aired; DVD sales, a feature film (Serenity), graphic novels, books, and fan conventions have kept up interest in the show.

Browncoat – a diehard fan of the show Firefly.

Browncoat Facts About Me:

  • When I watched the first aired episode (“The Train Job”) I had no idea what was going on with Whedon’s new series, but I loved the idea of having the characters swear in Chinese and decided to keep watching.
  • By the end of the second aired episode, I’d fallen in love with the series but already figured it wouldn’t stay on long so I recorded the rest, convinced it would never make it to video or DVD.
  • I now own three DVD sets, two of which are currently on loan to friends who haven’t before seen the series.
  • I’m Kayleegirl on FireflyFans.net. I haven’t visited there in awhile, but I do have one story in the Blue Sun Room (“A Not-So-Shiny Christmas”) which I posted in three parts after giving it to a friend as part of her Christmas gift.
  • I saw Serenity seven times when it was first released in theaters, twice with a group of friends and the other five times on my own.
  • On my recent visit to Epcot one of my happiest moments was finding—and, of course, buying—a blue jacket in the China gift store that’s very similar to the one Kaylee wears when she first meets Shepherd Book.

I submit the list above so that when I say that my love of this Whedon ‘Verse pales in comparison to that of many Browncoats, I want you to understand my full meaning.

Now, if you’re already a fan of the show, you may recognize that for the last sentence above, I’ve tweaked one of Simon Tam’s lines from Firefly’s the pilot episode “Serenity” to make my point. If you’re a Browncoat, you’ll know the words I’ve changed and the exact context of the original quote. If you’ve never seen or even heard of the show, I’m not surprised. Not your fault. The network-that-shall-remain-nameless on which the series originally and very briefly appeared, seemed set on dooming it from the start. The pilot episode was actually the last episode that network aired. Thus, my initial confusion upon watching “The Train Job.” Who were these characters? Why the mix of Chinese culture with themes from westerns, Civil War films and science fiction? Why was the ship’s captain in the tight brown pants so silly, yet so filled with angst? Why was the big gun toting guy named Jayne? Luckily, I’m a person who gets intrigued by unanswered questions and not turned off. I watched the show, bought the DVDs so I could see the unaired episodes and continue to get psyched about any mention of the show, i.e. I am a Browncoat.

Nathan Fillion—another Browncoat.  He had the lead role in the series (Malcolm Reynolds, aforesaid ship’s captain in the tight brown pants) and he continues to take an interest. If you watch Castle and haven’t seen Firefly, then you’re missing a lot of great moments built into Castle’s episodes that only Firefly fans will fully appreciate. Want an example? Sorry. They’re way too difficult to explain unless you’ve seen Firefly, due to the very unique nature of that fictional world. Want to be in the know? Soon you’ll be able to see what all my fuss is about even without ordering up the series on Netflicks, buying the DVD set or borrowing one of mine.

The Science Channel will air all the episodes (in the right order) beginning this Sunday, March 6th. To get a quick rundown of each episode and some idea if what the series is all about check out the episode guide on the Science Channel’s site. To see how much interest Nathan Fillion still has in the show, check out his brief interview at Entertainment Weekly’s site. I hope all the Castle fans and sci fi fans who haven’t seen Firefly yet will watch and enjoy. And hopefully become fellow Browncoats. The more, the better. If our ranks continue to grow, perhaps there will be another movie or a spinoff series someday. (I have a friend—Dave Perry—who thinks I’m crazy for holding onto those hopes, but he’s much younger than I am. I lived through the long the years of seeing Star Trek go from canceled series to major TV, film and publishing franchise. Not to mention fun filled spoofs. Never give up, never surrender.)

For the time being, I can enjoy the small delights of the Monday/Tuesday network TV shows Chuck, The Cape, Castle, and V that give me a chance to see four Firefly alumni in action again: Adam Baldwin (Chuck) who played Jayne on Firefly, Summer Glau (The Cape) who played River Tam; Nathan Fillion (Castle) who played our beloved captain tightpants; and Morena Baccarin (V) who played Inara. It’s not the same as a new episode of Firefly, but it does keep me happy for now.

About FireflyFans.net…I had to take a look-see to get the link for my story and found out there’s a new updated site, FFF.NET Ver 2.0, which is said to be still under construction but looks pretty darn shiny to me. Check it out at: http://beta.fireflyfans.net/main.aspx Best bunch of Browncoats in the ‘Verse.  And, if you do get hooked on Firefly and want more, you’ll find lots of fan fiction there in the Blue Sun Room to keep you going.

Posted in Firefly, sci fi shows | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Two Kinds of Chick Flicks, Sci Fi and V

Are you watching V?

Okay, so it’s not BSG or Firefly (although the cast list does include two of the Firefly alumni: Alan Tudyk in a brief lizardy role for three episodes in season one and Morena Baccarin in a lead role as the evil and awesome lizard queen Ana). But it is cheesy good fun for a Tuesday night. Not anywhere near as cheesy as the original series with Marc Singer, but it’ll do.

Did we expect more from this series? Possibly. After the big conversion of Battlestar Galactica from mini-caped starship jockeys and mechanical dogs to angst-filled warriors and sexy, humanoid Cylons on a dark, twisted religious quest I’m still hopeful that someday we’ll get another such welcome surprise.

Honestly though, I’m glad V stayed light and fluffy. It’s time for some fun sci fi again, Saturday matinee, don’t-take-it-so-seriously stuff. And really, lizard-like aliens in big spaceships with an evil plan—can you make that into a believable doom and gloom tragedy? Someone probably has. (As Craig Ferguson’s fond of saying: I look forward to your letters.) But, don’t you miss the tongue in cheek humor of SG1 and Stargate Altantis? There’s a potential in that for V, if the powers that be allow the writers to throw in more moments like the one last week when Father Jack commented on Hobbes’ need for closet space to accommodate his many black t-shirts. The hunky mercenary in tight black tees is just one of the many clichés that could be poked at for the fun of it.  Speaking of Hobbes, or rather Charles Mesure, the actor who plays him…

Another reason I like this incarnation of V is the same reason I liked watching the original: the hot guy factor. In the eighties, we had Marc Singer saving the day in tight jeans or undercover in a red jumpsuit. This time around we’ve got Mesure along with Morris Chestnut, Joel Gretsch, and for awhile Oded Fehr (who, might I say, is aging very, very well). For me, more handsome guys means more reasons to while away an hour on a weeknight.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m a woman who loves to read science fiction, even the type that leans heavy on hard science to drive the plot. I also love high-tech suspense and detective stories with a cool, pared down style like Robert B. Parker’s Jesse Stone series. I’ve never understood why this surprises men. Good stories, good writing: what’s not to like? Once, when I was taking my lunch break in a mall food court and reading one of Asmiov’s books, a man actually stopped by my table just to tell me how amazing it was to see a female reading Asimov. Another time, I couldn’t convince my then boyfriend that I wanted to see The Hunt For Red October because I’d read the book and all rest of Tom Clancy’s novels. He kept thanking me for letting him pick the film for the night and assuring me that next time we’d go see something that I would like. Of course, aside from quality story telling, there was another factor that I enjoyed seeing Red October so much—not one to tell a date, though. A bonus in most sci fi, war films, cop shows and adventure films is the makeup of the cast: lots of hunky guys.

You see, there are two kinds of chick flicks. Let me clarify (especially for the powers that be in TV and films seeking to capture the female demographic): The first kind is the romantic, sentimental kind (Sleepless In Seattle, When Harry Met Sally, and so on).  Then, there are the packed-with-action-and-hot guys kind (Backdraft, Terminator films, Star Trek 2009).  So, while I don’t know if the hot women actors in V are enough for male sci fi fans to keep tuning in, I can tell you there are lots of us chicks who tune in for the hot guys in the cast.

There is one chick factor the new V lacks: cute and/or nerdy guys. Granted Bret Harrison, from Reaper, has recently joined the cast as Dr. Sidney Miller, but we could use a few more cuties in the series. I used to watch Stargate Atlantis just as much for Paul McGillion and David Hewlett as for Joe Flanagan and Jason Momoa. And where are the innocent, nice-lizard guys? I long for a character like Willy, played by Robert Englund, in the original V mini-series.

Oh, yes. There is a big point in V’s favor that I haven’t mentioned: the strong female characters. But that’s a topic for another day.

Posted in sci fi shows | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Two Kinds of Chick Flicks, Sci Fi and V

What’s in the Header? Part 1

Short answer: lots of stuff, but not even close to all the books and paraphernalia I’ve collected over the years.

I’ve pulled together just a few of my treasures to give hint of where my mind usually goes when I start thinking about science fiction and fantasy. Every once in awhile, I’ll point out one or two of the items and let you in on why I’m attached to them. Where to begin?

Let me direct your eye to the objects a bit to the right of the center: deceptively simple ring dangling on a chain, leaf pin and —what are those box-like objects at top behind the ring and chain?—ah, yes, the boxed sets of the special extended DVD editions of The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and Return of the King.

When The Two Towers came out, I went to the midnight show with a group of friends —nerds all, but not nerdy enough to dress as inhabitants of Middle Earth. (Do I regret that not-dressing-up part? Possibly.) The year before, when Fellowship hit the theaters, I had gone to see that film by myself. I hadn’t yet found my fellowship, but that’s not to say I was friendless. The truth is, I enjoy going alone to see a movie every once in awhile. If you’ve never done that, try it. It’s a totally different experience and it can be a great one, especially when the film is important to you. I’d seen (with friends) the cartoon version of LOTR. The Nazgûl were cool (can’t seem to miss with those guys in any format), but the rest­—not so good. But that night, from the first few seconds of Peter Jackson’s film, I watched magic unfold on the screen. Alone, I could disappear into the experience. I felt I was in Middle Earth. (At least up to the point after Gandalf brings his staff down to crack the Bridge at Kazahd Dûm and a woman in the audience said, loudly, “I guess he doesn’t want him to pass.”)

From The Two Towers on, I’ve been lucky to share the films and hours of discussion about the films and books with my happy fellowship of nerds. So the trilogy, in both mediums, means a lot to me. I’ve stopped counting how many times I’ve watched these DVDs alone or with friends. I love the films, the extra features, the oh-so-right packaging details. My favorite extra feature? I do like the “From Book to Script” extras because comparing the books to the films is a favorite pastime. But my absolute favorite would have to be the commentary track by Billy Boyd and Dominic Monaghan. Hmm, which movie is that one on? On no, I feel a LOTR marathon coming on.

By the way, the miniature sword. Could it be Aragorn’s? Boromir’s? Gandalf’s? Come on, nerds. You’re better than that.  It’s not even from LOTR. Any guesses?

Posted in Lord of the Rings, What's in the Header? | Tagged , | 4 Comments